The world of fragrance is a fickle mistress. Beloved scents, cherished for their unique compositions and evocative power, are often subject to reformulation, sometimes subtly, sometimes drastically. One such fragrance that has experienced significant scrutiny and debate surrounding a reformulation is Dior Homme Intense. Specifically, the 2017 version sparked considerable discussion amongst fragrance enthusiasts, primarily centered around the perceived loss of certain key notes and the overall shift in the fragrance's character. This article will delve into the specifics of the 2017 Dior Homme Intense reformulation, examining the changes, comparing it to the original formulation, and addressing common queries such as the return of cocoa, longevity in later versions (including the 2020 iteration), refill availability, and overall user opinions.
The original Dior Homme Intense, released in 2007, quickly gained iconic status. Its rich, dark, and sophisticated blend of iris, cocoa, leather, and amber captivated a devoted following. The intense sweetness of the cocoa, balanced by the powdery iris and the smoky leather, created a unique and undeniably masculine fragrance. This original formulation became a benchmark for many, a standard against which later releases and similar fragrances were measured. However, the 2017 reformulation marked a significant departure, prompting questions, comparisons, and a wave of online discussion.
The Question of Cocoa: The Heart of the Controversy
One of the most frequently asked questions surrounding the 2017 reformulation centers around the cocoa note. Many users reported a significant reduction, or even complete absence, of the prominent cocoa present in the original. It was this rich, almost gourmand-like cocoa that contributed significantly to the fragrance's unique character and addictive quality. The claim that the cocoa was removed, or significantly diminished, formed the core of much of the negative feedback surrounding the reformulation. While Dior has never explicitly confirmed or denied altering the cocoa concentration, the overwhelming consensus among fragrance enthusiasts suggests a noticeable difference in its presence. The 2017 version, while still retaining elements of the original, felt noticeably less gourmand and less intensely sweet. Whether this was a deliberate change to broaden the appeal or a consequence of sourcing and cost-cutting remains a matter of speculation.
Dior Homme Intense Superdrug and Accessibility:
The reformulation also impacted the availability of Dior Homme Intense. While previously available across a wider range of retailers, including potentially Superdrug in the UK (depending on location and stock), the reformulated version may have seen altered distribution strategies. The accessibility of the fragrance, however, has remained relatively consistent, with most major department stores and online retailers continuing to stock the newer iterations.
Dior Homme 2020 Longevity and Performance:
The 2020 iteration of Dior Homme Intense further fueled the discussion surrounding the reformulations. While not a drastically different fragrance from the 2017 version, it contributed to the ongoing debate about longevity and projection. Many users reported that the longevity of the 2017 and subsequent releases, including the 2020 version, was noticeably reduced compared to the original. This decrease in performance is a common complaint associated with many reformulated fragrances, often attributed to changes in the concentration of fragrance oils or the use of different fixatives. The 2020 Dior Homme Intense notes likely remained similar to the 2017 version, but the overall impact was perceived as weaker and less long-lasting by many users.
current url：https://eegwmw.h361a.com/guide/dior-homme-intense-2017-reformulation-26023
moord op versace netflix soundtrack givenchy glamour on the gold 3step makeup palette